Comments on: Are Webmail Storage Quotas Redundant? http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/ BizExcellerated Internet Marketing: Achieve mastery in blogging, affiliate marketing, social traffic generation at Andrew Wee Sun, 30 Apr 2017 19:59:06 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.9 By: How to Login to Gmail on Android Device Using Gmail App/Browser - Damn Ritch http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-3328195 Sun, 30 Apr 2017 19:59:06 +0000 http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-3328195 […] source: http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/ […]

]]>
By: Rachit http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-296601 Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:39:41 +0000 http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-296601 Actually I have to disagree … I’ve used my GMail account for about 3 years now and before GMail just raised their limit, I was at 97% (after I had to delete a lot of stuff to remain under 100%).

And having that storage space has been a huge boon. Having my files backed up on Google’s servers (which are distributed and backed up several times over), is actually much more reliable than my own computers (Windows dies, that’s a reality).

As for running out of space, it’s not that hard. For example, I get powerpoint presentations, documents and PDF files in my gmail account. An average PPT runs 2-4 MB. Documents run 200KB to 2MB. PDF files are in the same range. And if I’m working on this stuff with a team, I have to send and receive these thru my gmail account. With an average of 7-8 revisions for every PPT file, each presentation eats up 40+ MB in my account.

Of course, this doesn’t include those which have audio add-ons.

Now, many ppl don’t see this happening because they primarily use one computer and use desktop software. But when we have computers at office, computers at home, a laptop for travelling, and ready Internet everywhere … Web-based emails are more useful.

And if you exchange versions of any kind of documents, its not hard to fill up a few gigabytes.

Of course, I agree that Google was using this as a selling point. But they really screwed up there. Initially, they had advertised an “infinity + 1” storage plan for Gmail (On their 2nd anniversary) ….

But this year, they started asking people for money for more storage! That’s like cheating … I’m glad that Yahoo & MSN stepped up to offer great email solutions. Both Windows Live and the new Yahoo mail are very capable emails … good enough to match Gmail feature for feature.

So I guess we should be thanking Google for upping the stakes in the email game. I suppose it’s harder for them to match their own standards of evolution now.

]]>
By: robert http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-288863 Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:47:53 +0000 http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-288863 you are right Andrew.

I guess it just depends on the amount of money someone is willing to spend on email storage.

BTW, I can’t wait to get my hands on the cool product you and Amit are working on right now.

]]>
By: Andrew Wee http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-283687 Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:01:13 +0000 http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-283687 In reply to robert.

Seems a little counter-intuitive to create multiple emails just to save a little.

I think that $10-20 is something well spent.

I continue to pay a crazy price to maintain my email (with a 10mb quota) at my old ISP from the early 90s, just because people still mail me there.

]]>
By: Andrew Wee http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-283684 Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:59:42 +0000 http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-283684 In reply to Sam Harrelson.

unfortunately, i am experiencing a lot of inertia against picking up linux, php, or any other coding…

I have a couple of greasemonkey texts around, but it’ll be some time till i get to them.

]]>
By: robert http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-283272 Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:00:06 +0000 http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-283272 Sam,

you know you can always get a second gmail account.
that way you won’t have to pay extra for the storage.
back in ’04 it was kinda hard to get 2 gmail accounts but now that’s it’s one for all and all for one, it’s quite easy.

]]>
By: jen_chan, writer SureFireWealth.com http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-282972 Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:11:47 +0000 http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-282972 I often wonder about that. While I do not have a gmail account, Yahoo! does provide a large quota space for its users. I never even make it to the middle. But you gave an interesting thought. What if they’re all getting ready for something much bigger than just writing messages and attaching files? You never know what they will spring on you.

]]>
By: Sam Harrelson » GMail Lockdown http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-282052 Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:18:18 +0000 http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-282052 […] learn me, eh?  Especially after I left a few glowing comments about GMail on Andrew Wee’s post about GMail memory […]

]]>
By: Sam Harrelson http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-281930 Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:07:24 +0000 http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-281930 Yep, everything is backed up and packed away nicely just in case. Always a good idea!

As to the features point, you can do a great deal with GreaseMonkey scripts in Firefox. That’s not immediately user friendly or available to casual users, but if you’ve got a little hacker in your blood, you can do wonders with GreaseMonkey and GMail!

]]>
By: Andrew Wee http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-281924 Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:54:41 +0000 http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-281924 In reply to Sam Harrelson.

Sam,
Have you backed up all your jun, er, stuff in there?

Losing 3gb of work and personal memories can be really painful.

You’d think with all the new-fangled stuff that’s taking place, email ought to at least implement tag clouds, automated mail filters, ajax tech…ok, don’t get me started…

Text messaging and integrated VOIP is great, but…the bread and butter issues need to be taken care of first, don’t you think?

]]>
By: Sam Harrelson http://whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-281916 Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:34:40 +0000 http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-281916 I actually had to pay for more storage for my GMail account since I was getting close to maximum!

I’ve had my account since a couple of days after their launch in ’04 and it’s full of all sorts of old emails and files. I honestly use GMail as my storage box / external “cloud drive” and keep all sorts of things (files, pics, .zips, notes, etc) in there. You just can’t beat the search function there!

]]>