Comments on: Is one Internet Marketing guru ‘better’ than another?

By: Andrew Wee

Andrew Wee — Sat, 11 Nov 2006 23:56:01 +0000

Edmund,
I am not one to make blanket comparisons to imply that one event is not worth it because it’s too expensive or there’s an upsell.

Or that one event is ‘better’ than another.

Every participant has to decide whether it’s worth it for them.

I am an active user of the products I promote.

I think the person you spoke to who went for Derek’s seminar was just plain naive. They obviously did not get the benefit of the event, but in your email you insinuated that the event was not worth it.

None of this is ‘mudslinging’ or ‘naming names in public’.
You distributed this information via an email list (a very public forum).

If you can’t stand for your emails to be referenced in public, in the mass media, then it’s good to vet your content carefully.

I felt uncomfortable with the content of your email.

But I guess that’s your decision.

By: Edmund Ng

Edmund Ng — Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:36:29 +0000

I’ve sent out this email to my mailing list. I don’t know why you are feeling so pissed about. If you want to do mudslinging and name names in public. I’m by all means.

By: Chee Shan

Chee Shan — Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:15:59 +0000

Well, as we all should know at this time and age, burning bridges simply isn’t the way to go, and it holds true especially in the field of Internet Marketing. As I’ve mentioned before on my blog, ‘coopetition’ is the key to success.

So if you’re planning to launch a mud-slinging campaign anytime soon… Think. And think again.