About Andrew Wee
Andrew Wee | Blogging | Affiliate Marketing | Social Traffic Generation | Internet Marketing

BizExcellerated Internet Marketing: Achieve mastery in blogging, affiliate marketing, social traffic generation at Andrew Wee

Twitter Metrics Are A Complete Waste Of Time

I had a twitter conversation with TopRank Online Marketing CEO Lee Odden about the launch of WebProNews’ new Twitter directory/indexing service Twellow.com.


Great things about Twellow:

  • Categorizes twitter streams by vertical/niche, eg: automotive, movies, blogging, news
  • Groups related twitterers together

It’s offset by one major flaw, which unfortunately is tied to Twitter’s current state of development – analytics don’t mean much more than a brute force “followers” number.

The higher the number of followers, the higher you’ll rank in the results, with the net effect that Robert Scoble is ranked first with 28,000 followers, followed by Jake Marsh with 12,000, in the blogging category.

The results are limited by the enrollment of your twitter feed into the system for benchmarking and indexing.

But I’m having serious doubts about using followers as the determining criteria.

Could social networks be the new playground for blackhat marketers?

In the initial stages of Yahoo MyBlogLog’s launch, I know of a number of programmers who automated the creation of new profiles and artificially inflated community sizes and went out to spread spammy marketing messages.

With the current state of Twitter development, what’s to stop marketers from either automating or farming out the creation of a horde of twitter followers, thereby artificially inflating the size of their community.

It’s not secret that a forum with 100,000 registered members with 5-10 active users is pretty much dead. What about a twitter account with 50,000 inactive followers?

I wonder if Twitter will enforce a minimum activity threshold (a number of twitters sent out within a set time interval) like some webmail providers have instituted to continually prune dead and inactive accounts.

Will Twitter be able to present useful stats in the future? Likely, but not in the near future as they’re still coping with growing pains and the resource overhead of third party Twitter API calls, to the extent that pagination (an archive of your twitter conversation) and “replies” (twitter messages that you have received) have been disabled.


It could be a while before we see Twitter metrics evolve to comprehensive display the time visitors are spending reading your updates (ie stickiness) and clicking through to your links (conversion?).

Till then “followers” could be a proxy for a twitter popularity contest (traffic quality is a big question mark).

Tread lightly. A conservative approach can do more to preserve your social goodwill, rather than making rash experimental stabs.

3 comments on Twitter Metrics Are A Complete Waste Of Time

  1. Brian Weaver
    June 27, 2008 at 11:06 am (4501 days ago)

    I personally don’t think that in this instance that the # of followers is a good metric to judge someone by. However, if someone who ads me has a high number of followers yet follows less, I am more like to give them a follow back. ( If I feel their tweets are useful to me)

    However, whenever I find the opposite is true (low followers and they follow an outrageous amount of people) I don’t even bother looking at their tweets to see if I’m interested in what they are tweeting.

  2. Bobbie Stacey
    January 6, 2010 at 6:18 am (3943 days ago)

    The way clout and influence are currently measured, I feel like I’m a late-comer to an Amway distribution network. So true that having a 100,000 followers is meaningless when only five of them are every listening.

  3. ???
    June 15, 2013 at 11:28 pm (2687 days ago)

    Hey there, You’ve done an incredible occupation. I’ll definitely digg it and in my opinion suggest to my friends. I am confident they will be benefited from this web site.

Leave a reply